Research peptide retailer
Pretty Peptide
Lab not named
CoAs vaguely 'on request', no named lab, advertised QR 'Batch Check' portal not confirmed functional; no matching UK company found; Glow Stack listing language edges toward beauty-benefit claims despite RUO.
Headline price
Not disclosed
Regulated as
Not disclosed
Delivery area
Not disclosed
Certificate of Analysis profile
CoA per batch
Yes
Access
on-request
Lab
generic "independent third-party lab testing" - no specific lab name given
QR-verifiable
No
Trust Index status
CoA: partial40/100 · B-
Founded
Not disclosed
Companies House
Not disclosed
Business Transparency
Not established
Last verified
2026-08-19
No UK trading entity found
We searched UK Companies House thoroughly (exact name, exact phrase, and plausible variants) and found no matching registration, despite this site presenting as UK-based. This caps the CoA tier below green regardless of score. It is not proof of wrongdoing, only that we could not confirm who operates this business: see methodology.
- ⚠ Publishes benefit claims next to products despite research-only framing
- ⚠ No UK trading entity could be found despite a thorough search, though the site presents as UK-based
CoA library: https://prettypeptide.co.uk/pages/certificates
Re-checked on a rolling basis, not a fixed monthly cycle; see the last-verified date above. See methodology for how this is scored.
Separate from the CoA score
Responsible Practice assessment
Clear and responsible- · 'Extensively studied for its role in' -- standard, well-hedged research-literature framing.
- · Benefit-claim language observed on site: "GHK‑Cu is extensively studied for its role in signalling the production of collagen and elastin in skin cells."
We assess what a brand publishes and makes available to customers, not its intentions. Full framework and what each status means: how we assess brands. Think this is wrong? Email [email protected] with evidence.
Not yet Independently Verified
The CoA tier and Responsible Practice status above are free and mechanical. Nobody, including Pretty Peptide, has paid for the deeper lab-accreditation, batch-traceability, and corporate-history checks yet. Request that it be run →
Our verdict
Last reviewed 2026-08-19. PeptideClear earns nothing when readers click through, and this link carries no tracking. Editorial criteria are documented in our methodology.
Ready to start?
Visit Pretty Peptide →
No commission earned. Untracked link, direct to Pretty Peptide.